QlikView vs. Power BI – What is Better?

For users to choose between QlikView vs. Power BI is a hard task. Both this business intelligence software have their strengths and shortcomings. Qlikview is a very strong player in the domain of business intelligence software. It is a suitable option, only that its execution abilities and vision formation need improvement. The question is, however, if QlikView has the upper hand over Power BI?

If you want to decide which BI solution is a good option for you amongst QlikView and Power BI, then you must first understand the functioning of both these programs.

A detailed study about QlikView vs. Power BI

Power Bi possibly outperforms all others. However, QlikView has some issues with file sizing, which is a major concern. Power BI comes up with authenticated results. It is also better at the recovery of Smart data. It gives more scope to the user when it comes to customizing visual charts as per the need; QlikView is not that good.

QlikView is regarded as one of the most pliable Business Intelligence platforms. An Associative Experience is the USP of QlikView. It helps the users in gaining complex business insights by analyzing data association and its relations. Moreover, it makes data searching easily in all applications across the world, be it indirect or direct search.

It senses slowly with the increase in scope. Nonetheless, improvements have been made in the area. This slow reviving time is a problem when comparing QlikView vs. Power BI. Microsoft can sort it and add another better search option. Searching is highly improved now, finished visualizations can be pinned now, and the sheets formed in the desktop help in breaking moving graphics around. There is a need to pin them every time before starting a new session. The good thing, however, is that it’s doable now.

You can do so by linking the in-page filter with the side filters. Then, you can filter the visuals and add drill down to the tables. The editing option in the visual charts allows you to export, print graphics and pages, and load tables from other Power BI Application files. Then, you can introduce an original Pivot Table, edit it, and check the Matrix table down.

The results are near now. If it allows you to click and drag images and visuals, then it indicates that they may be having a very authentic product. The fee charged by them is also very less ($119 per user annual).

If you compare the reloading times of QlikView vs. Power BI, Power BI takes around 1 minute and 40 seconds while QlikView takes few seconds (testing done for a sample desktop). An issue of concern here is the exploration facility of the cloud as well as desktop versions. This feature plays a crucial role in locating records quickly.

All this is effectively good, but the time it takes is very long. Both are preferable, but the View approach for color themes is a better option. It performs better and is quick in producing a sheet that looks much professional. It is also better for new users as it produces lesser bad results.

Let’s have a look at the drill-down and around feature. To turn it on, right-click the arrow hand down button. The drill-down feature will only work upon this chart and not to other charts from any other page. Another right-click option will now emerge (see below>>drill down). However, the drill-down feature would still apply to only a single chart.

This unexpectedness is a result of the query less being filtered. This happens when any data point is snapped by the in a particular field, and all other fields then suddenly start filtering themselves based on the chosen data. The selection making approach used here is a result of in-memory architecture.

This feature takes care of the shortcomings that occur while using the regular disk-based or query-based Power BI tools. Speed is the value add here. If the user has adequate processing power, then it will be possible to analyze a large quantity of data and generate results super quick.

It must be noted that even with these advantages, QlikView is not preferable for everyone when it comes to Qlikview vs. Power BI. Unless you are a Data Scientist or Data Programmer, you might get confused by the free structure of its solution’s forms or the complex detailing it entails. It limits the scope to which the large and integrated organizations can utilize the solution. Also, if you are already using additional Microsoft products and platforms, then Power BI can be your default option for any BI solution. This is because joining a BI within a Microsoft powered organization would be very easy.

PS: read more about the comprehensive Blink vs. Arlo comparison and the top best Spunk alternatives.

Eight quick comparisons between QlikView vs. Power BI

1. Content creation and Analysis: Power BI over QlikView

Power BI has the upper hand in authoring as well as visual and mobile exploration. When it comes to analyzing the embedded advanced analytics that both the software generates, Power BI stands the winner with authentic and verified results. QlikView needs some improvements here. Power BI performs better in Smart data recovery. However, the solutions offered by both the applications propose a similar degree of provision for an advanced analytics dashboard.

2. Data management for the enterprise: QlikView over Power BI

QlikView has better ETL and data storage capabilities, and they are much better than Power BI’s individuals. They emphasize more on the usability for the customer and also take care of better customer experience.

3. Simplicity in establishing findings: QlikView over Power BI

QlikView is the better option to go for. It delivers user-friendly intuitive applications and results. It then enables the users to easily establish, share, and combine data results with the content.

4. Infrastructural support: Power BI over QlikView

The race between QlikView vs. Power BI in this domain is very close. QlikView shares the same position with Power BI when it comes to infrastructure, administration, and security. However, Power BI gains the upper hand in data source connectivity. QlikView is dependent upon the extensive APIs for its integration with essential business applications and system administration software. The same goes for the Salesforce as well.

On the other hand, Power BI eases support with enabling integration with several software. Some of these are Microsoft Dynamics, Google Analytics, Salesforce, comScore, GitHub, Mailchimp, Adobe Analytics, Azure Mobile Management, Circuit ID, MS Excel, and the list goes on.

5. Easy learning process: Power BI over QlikView

The process of QlikView is easier for people who are well versed in Data Science. However, for the others, it would cause too much stress. Power BI is, thus, the option for such people as it comes with a user-friendly operating system. Working with Power BI is as simple as working with advanced MS Excel.

6. Ease in operation: Power BI over QlikView

QlikView supports a built in to allow analytics. It also enables the users to operate within the code itself and also to test using their own models. These processes will sound easy to Data scientists or hardcore Data Developers. However, to the people who find it hard to manage visions to make timely business decisions, the process might rather feel straining.

7. Better features: Power BI over QlikView

Both the software provides the user with a lot of features. However, in terms of utility, the ones offered by Power BI are better. They are more easily accessible to everyone, from people in Marketing to Sales as well as other similar fields. The following summary by FinancesOnline provides a list of these features.

Better features

8. Cost efficiency: Power BI over QlikView

The fee breakup of Power Bi is very simple and straightforward. It has a free desktop version, while the Pro version charges around $10 per user monthly. Its latest version is Power BI Premium. It offers capacity-based pricing that enables one to optimize the costs.

Andrew Peterson, in Redmond Magazine, explained the pricing system of Power BI. Premium Power BI divides licensing between the content users and creators. Content creators need a Pro Power BI license even before. If you want to add more content creators, just get the license of Power BI pro. Similarly, if an organization wants to increase or even out scale the apps taken under premium license, it will just have to get more Capacity Nodes or upgrade the level.

On the other hand, QlikView’s fee structure is a complex one. It makes it tough to determine cost-effectiveness. The QlikView software has two editions- Personal and Enterprise. The QlikView personal version is free and meant for use on a personal desktop. The Enterprise edition and its fee can only be known by contacting the sales team.

However, if you go for QlikView, you get QlikView publisher as a benefit. You also get a data reloading and distributing service, extranet server license, plus the server for information access. However, going by the popular opinion, no operation can go above the cost efficiency of Power BI, not QlikView itself.

Cost efficiency Power BI
Cost efficiency QlikView

Some other factors to compare

  • The Page layout of both QlikView, as well as Power BI, is very good.
  • Both of them give a free demo and documentation is good too.
  • Power BI does Null Handling much better than QlikView.
  • QlikView already has the Print Export feature, while Power BI is still developing it.

Qlikview vs. Power BI: Why is Power BI better?

Every champion is believed to have an ace hidden inside its sleeve. Power BI is Microsoft’s software with different applications and platforms. It has a better level of platform workflow sets and an advance platform support for its Cloud BI. This gives Power BI an upper edge over QlikView. Adopting Power BI would be even easier if you are already working with SQL Server and Office 365. Power BI has a mobile app that gives it an added advantage of mobility. This feature serves great relief to the sales teams who desire updates and visions on the move.

Above all, the innovatory steps that are being taken to improve Power BI further are welcome news. The new version will be offering enhanced quality and satisfaction along with fast insights and solved queries at the Natural Language platform. In the words of Andrew Peterson, while the basic elements of Power BI are graphs and charts, Microsoft is making strides towards improving the background operations on queries in natural language. The improved version will be providing potential advances methods to conduct data queries.

It cannot be doubted that QlikView is a packaged product. Bernard Marr said in a Forbes states article, that, QlikView has more than 40,000 customer IDs around 100 countries. Users have highly appreciated the customization friendly set up of the software and its various features. This, however, may indicate the complexity of the tool. That is where a concern arises, why to go complex when you can act simply?

Power BI does the job. It is user-friendly and cost-effective. Regular updates, simpler user interface, and a robust infra are some of the many benefits it offers. For example, Power BI is now able to generate AI-powered app recommendations. Sound interesting?

The desktop version of Power BI has been made available by Microsoft on the Windows store. General Manager of Power BI, Kamal Hathi, announced that it would soon be easy for the enterprises to deliver the latest Power BI desktop version to the end customers. They will also be able to access great and latest features, all the stalled installation will get automatic updating, and the end-user will be able to do all this without needing Windows administrator rights.

We have noted that out of the two tools, Power BI has won the race. Its user-friendly features resonate better with most people. The promising up-gradation of the software also makes it a better choice. Well, if you still think that QlikView has an edge in the QlikView vs. Power BI tussle, do let us know in the comment section.